Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38622455›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2024

The FDA Reclassification of Cervical Pedicle and Lateral Mass Screws: A Case Study in Regulatory History.

Jonathan H Sussman, Ahmed Albayar, Anissa Saylany, Bhargavi R Budihal, Dominic Romeo, Jason Xu, Joshua Rosenow, Robert F Heary, William C Welch

Open access · hybridAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan H SussmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Floor 15, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA. jonathan.sussman@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Ahmed AlbayarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Floor 15, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Anissa SaylanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Floor 15, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bhargavi R BudihalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Floor 15, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Dominic RomeoDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jason XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Floor 15, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Joshua RosenowDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Robert F HearyDivision of Neurological Surgery, Mountainside Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Montclair, New Jersey, USA.
William C WelchDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Floor 15, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USHackensack University Medical Center Mountainside · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of medical devices by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) involves rigorous scrutiny from specialized panels that designate devices as Class I, II, or III depending on their levels of relative risk to patient health. Posterior rigid pedicle screw systems were first classified by the FDA in 1984 and have since revolutionized the treatment of many spine pathologies. Despite this early classification by the FDA, posterior cervical pedicle and lateral mass screws were not reclassified from unclassified to Class III and then to Class II until 2019, nearly 35 years after their initial classification. This reclassification process involved a decades-long interplay between the FDA, formal panels, manufacturers, academic leaders, practicing physicians, and patients. It was delayed by lawsuits and a paucity of data demonstrating the ability to improve outcomes for cervical spinal pathologies. The off-label use of thoracolumbar pedicle screw rigid fixation systems by early adopters assisted manufacturers and professional organizations in providing the necessary data for the reclassification process. This case study highlights the collaboration between physicians and professional organizations in facilitating FDA reclassification and underscores changes to the current classification process that could avoid the prolonged dichotomy between common medical practice and FDA guidelines.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraePedicle ScrewsUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationDevice ApprovalHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansUnited StatesCervical screwsDevice classificationFDA regulationFood, drug, and cosmetic actLateral mass screwsPedicle screw systems

Identifiers

PMID38622455
PMCPMC11169039
OpenAlexW4394804455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.