Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38622373›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2024

Effects of yeast culture on in vitro ruminal fermentation and microbial community of high concentrate diet in sheep.

Hongze Wang, Guiqiong Liu, Aimin Zhou, Huiguo Yang, Kun Kang, Sohail Ahmed, Biao Li, Umar Farooq, Fuqing Hou, Chaoli Wang and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Veterinary world · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects of yeast culture (Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hongze WangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Guiqiong LiuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Aimin ZhouKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Huiguo YangInstitute of Animal Husbandry, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Sciences, Urumqi, 830013, China.
Kun KangNational key Laboratory for Exploitation and Utilization of Agricultural Microbial Resources, Yichang, 443003, China.
Sohail AhmedKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Biao LiNational key Laboratory for Exploitation and Utilization of Agricultural Microbial Resources, Yichang, 443003, China.
Umar FarooqKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Fuqing HouNational Sheep Industry Technology System Shihezi Comprehensive Experimental Station, Shihezi, 832000, China.
Chaoli WangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Xue BaiNational Sheep Industry Technology System Shihezi Comprehensive Experimental Station, Shihezi, 832000, China.
Yan ChenKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Yi DingKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Xunping JiangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China. xpjiang@mail.hzau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7822-1784
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNAnimal Science Research Institute · CNShihezi University · CN

Funding

Breeding of High-Performance Meat Sheep in Major Program (JD) of Hubei Province 2023BAA029China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA CARS-38Germplasm innovation project of prolificacy sheep in Xinjiang agricultural region 2023A02004-1Scientific and technological innovation 2030 - major agricultural biological breeding project 2022ZD0401403Tianchi Talent and Tianshan Talent Distinguished Expert 2023-25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate effects of different yeast culture (YC) levels on in vitro fermentation characteristics and bacterial and fungal community under high concentrate diet. A total of 5 groups were included in the experiment: control group without YC (CON), YC1 (0.5% YC proportion of substrate dry matter), YC2 (1%), YC3 (1.5%) and YC4 (2%). After 48 h of fermentation, the incubation fluids and residues were collected to analyze the ruminal fermentation parameters and bacterial and fungal community. Results showed that the ruminal fluid pH of YC2 and YC4 groups was higher (P < 0.05) than that of CON group. Compared with CON group, the microbial protein, propionate and butyrate concentrations and cumulative gas production at 48 h of YC2 group were significantly increased (P < 0.05), whereas an opposite trend of ammonia nitrogen and lactate was observed between two groups. Microbial analysis showed that the Chao1 and Shannon indexes of YC2 group were higher (P < 0.05) than those of CON group. Additionally, YC supplementation significantly decreased (P < 0.05) Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001, Streptococcus bovis and Neosetophoma relative abundances. An opposite tendency of Aspergillus abundance was found between CON and YC treatments. Compared with CON group, the relative abundances of Prevotella, Succiniclasticum, Butyrivibrio and Megasphaera elsdenii were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in YC2 group, while Apiotrichum and unclassified Clostridiales relative abundances were decreased (P < 0.05). In conclusion, high concentrate substrate supplemented with appropriate YC (1%) can improve ruminal fermentation and regulate bacterial and fungal composition.

Indexed as

Bacterial communityFungal communityGas productionRumen fermentationYeast culture

Identifiers

PMID38622373
PMCPMC11018729
OpenAlexW4394822301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.