ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Community cohesion looseness in gene networks reveals individualized drug targets and resistance.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- MODCAN: driver gene identification based on multi-omics features and differential co-association networks for tumor subtypes.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Cell graph analysis in hepatocellular carcinoma: predicting local recurrence and identifying spatial relationship biomarkers.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- GABRP Mediates GABA-A Receptor to Shape Tumor Immunosuppressive Microenvironment and Promote Tumor Immune Escape and Corresponding Targeted Therapy.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Expression of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor subunit π and minichromosome maintenance-3 in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a target molecule or a proliferation marker?Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Community cohesion plays a critical role in the determination of an individual's health in social science. Intriguingly, a community structure of gene networks indicates that the concept of community cohesion could be applied between the genes as well to overcome the limitations of single gene-based biomarkers for precision oncology. Here, we develop community cohesion scores which precisely quantify the community ability to retain the interactions between the genes and their cellular functions in each individualized gene network. Using breast cancer as a proof-of-concept study, we measure the community cohesion score profiles of 950 case samples and predict the individualized therapeutic targets in 2-fold. First, we prioritize them by finding druggable genes present in the community with the most and relatively decreased scores in each individual. Then, we pinpoint more individualized therapeutic targets by discovering the genes which greatly contribute to the community cohesion looseness in each individualized gene network. Compared with the previous approaches, the community cohesion scores show at least four times higher performance in predicting effective individualized chemotherapy targets based on drug sensitivity data. Furthermore, the community cohesion scores successfully discover the known breast cancer subtypes and we suggest new targeted therapy targets for triple negative breast cancer (e.g. KIT and GABRP). Lastly, we demonstrate that the community cohesion scores can predict tamoxifen responses in ER+ breast cancer and suggest potential combination therapies (e.g. NAMPT and RXRA inhibitors) to reduce endocrine therapy resistance based on individualized characteristics. Our method opens new perspectives for the biomarker development in precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.