Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38622312›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2024

A review of multi-disciplinary decomposition research and key drivers of variation in decay.

Donna B McIntyre, Blake M Dawson, Benjamin M Long, Philip S Barton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Donna B McIntyreFuture Regions Research Centre, Federation University, Mount Helen, VIC, 3350, Australia. db.mcintyre@federation.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1747-0839
Blake M DawsonSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2350, Australia.
Benjamin M LongFuture Regions Research Centre, Federation University, Mount Helen, VIC, 3350, Australia.
Philip S BartonFuture Regions Research Centre, Federation University, Mount Helen, VIC, 3350, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decomposition of animal remains is a multifaceted process, involving ecological, biological, and chemical interactions. While the complexity is acknowledged through concepts like the necrobiome, it's unclear if this complexity is reflected in research. Appreciation of the complexity of decomposition is crucial for identifying sources of variation in estimations of time since death in medico-legal science, as well as building broader ecological knowledge of the decomposition process. To gain insights into the extent of multidisciplinary research in the field of decomposition science, we conducted an examination of peer-reviewed literature on four key drivers of variation: volatile organic compounds, microbes, drugs/toxins, and insects. Among 650 articles, we identified their scientific discipline, driver/s of variation investigated, and year of publication. We found that 19% explored relationships between two drivers, while only 4% investigated interactions between three. None considered all four drivers. Over the past three decades, there has been a steady increase in decomposition research publications, signifying its growing importance. Most research (79%) was linked to forensic science, highlighting opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration in decomposition science. Overall, our review underscores the need to incorporate multidisciplinary approaches and theory into contemporary decomposition research.

Indexed as

Postmortem ChangesVolatile Organic CompoundsAnimalsForensic SciencesHumansInsectaInterdisciplinary ResearchVolatile Organic CompoundsEntomologyMicrobesNecrobiomeVolatile Organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID38622312
PMCPMC11306653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.