Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38622168›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

On the reproducibility of electron-beam lithographic fabrication of photonic nanostructures.

Pankaj K Sahoo, Eve Coates, Callum D Silver, Kezheng Li, Thomas F Krauss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pankaj K SahooPhotonics Research Group, School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK. pankaj.sahoo@york.ac.uk.
Eve CoatesPhotonics Research Group, School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Callum D SilverPhotonics Research Group, School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Kezheng LiPhotonics Research Group, School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Thomas F KraussPhotonics Research Group, School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Funding

EPSRC EP/V047434/1EPSRC EP/V047663/1Welcome Trust Grant 221349/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photonic nanostructures such as gratings and ring resonators have become ubiquitous building blocks in Photonics. For example, they are used in filters, they resonantly enhance signals and act as grating couplers. Much research effort is invested in using such structures to create novel functionalities, which often employs electron-beam lithography. An intrinsic issue in this field is the ability to accurately achieve a specific operating wavelength, especially for resonant systems, because nanometer-scale variations in feature size may easily detune the device. Here, we examine some of the key fabrication steps and show how to improve the reproducibility of fabricating wavelength scale photonic nanostructures. We use guided mode resonance grating sensors as our exemplar and find that the exposure condition and the development process significantly affect the consistency of the resonance wavelength, amplitude, and sensitivity of the sensor. By having careful control over these factors, we can achieve consistent performance for all the sensors studied, with less than 10% variation in their resonance behaviors. These investigations provide useful guidelines for fabricating nanostructures more reliably and to achieve a higher success rate in exploratory experiments.

Identifiers

PMID38622168
PMCPMC11018749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.