ArticleActas espanolas de psiquiatria2024
Psychological Stress Analysis to Evaluate the Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Mood Regulation and Quality of Life in Patients with Bipolar Disorder.
Article in Actas espanolas de psiquiatria, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for bipolar depression: effects on quality of life and functioning-an open-label study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on emotion regulation and quality of life in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and to evaluate the effectiveness of the mental stress analyzer.
methodsPatients with BD admitted to our hospital from August 2022 to August 2023 were retrospectively selected. For the present study, 60 patients who received drug therapy served as the control group, and the other 60 patients who received repeated transcranial stimulation on this basis served as the observation group. The heart rate variability (HRV) of the two groups of patients was detected by a mental stress analyzer/HRV analysis system. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to evaluate the mental state of the two groups of patients. The quality of life of the two groups was assessed using the Comprehensive Quality of Life Questionnaire 74 (GQOLI-74). Clinical effectiveness global rating scale-illness severity (CGI-SI) was used to evaluate the clinical symptoms of the two groups of patients, and the incidence of adverse reactions was calculated.
resultsIn comparison to the control group, the high-frequency power (HF) of the patients demonstrated an elevation in the observation group, and the low-frequency power (LF) and LF/HF were significantly reduced (p < 0.05). The standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN), standard deviation of all five-minute NN intervals (SDANN), root mean square of successive differences (rMSSD), and percent RR intervals with a difference in duration higher than 50 ms (PNN50) of patients in the observation group showed a notable increase compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the HAMD, SAS, and SDS scores of the patients in the observation group demonstrated a substantial decline relative to the control group (p < 0.05). In contrast to the control group, there was a significant increase in the overall clinical effectiveness rate among patients in the observation group, and the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly reduced (p < 0.05).
conclusionsRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has significant clinical effects in treating BD and can effectively improve patients' anxiety, suppress emotions, and regulate patients' emotions. At the same time, rTMS has high safety and little impact on the balance of patients' autonomic nervous function, reduces the incidence of adverse reactions, accelerates the patient's recovery process, and is suitable for clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.