Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38621680›Full record

ArticleDeutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2024

[Follow-up outpatient clinics for patients with post COVID: a survey to assess and characterize aspects of care].

Eva-Maria Skiba, Karl Philipp Drewitz, Ivonne Panchyrz, Stefanie Deckert, Christian Apfelbacher, Katharina Piontek

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [An insight into the long/post COVID care situation in Germany-a rapid scoping review].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eva-Maria SkibaInstitut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Universitätsmedizin Magdeburg.ORCID 0000-0001-5043-0728
Karl Philipp DrewitzInstitut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Universitätsmedizin Magdeburg.ORCID 0000-0003-0808-1987
Ivonne PanchyrzZentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden.ORCID 0000-0002-6827-8821
Stefanie DeckertZentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden.ORCID 0000-0002-4889-3632
Christian ApfelbacherInstitut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Universitätsmedizin Magdeburg.ORCID 0000-0003-3805-8219
Katharina PiontekInstitut für Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Universitätsmedizin Magdeburg.ORCID 0000-0002-2667-6741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After acute infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, up to 10 % of affected individuals suffer from long-term health impairments, also referred to as "Post-COVID". In Germany, specialized outpatient clinics have been established to care for patients with Post-COVID. A structured survey of the care situation is not yet available, but essential for a demand-oriented care. The present study aimed to systematically assess and describe structural and process-related aspects of care, and to perform an inventory and needs analysis of Post-COVID outpatient clinics in Germany.An online survey was developed assessing the structure and organization of the outpatient clinics, service offerings and networking of care from the perspective of the outpatient clinic directors. A total of 95 outpatient clinics were identified, and an invitation to participate in the online survey was sent via e-mail to the directors of the outpatient clinics. Data were collected between February and May 2022. Descriptive data analysis was performed.A total of 28 outpatient clinic managers (29 %) took part in the survey. Participants were between 32 and 66 years old, and 61 % (n = 17) were male. The outpatient clinics were most frequently affiliated with the specialties of pneumology (n = 10; 36 %), internal medicine, psychiatric and psychosomatic medicine, and neurology (n = 8; 29 %, respectively). Among the outpatient clinic directors, 64 % (n = 18) stated that the time spent waiting for an appointment was more than one month. Utilization (n = 25; 89 %), appointment demand (n = 26; 93 %), and the need for more Post-COVID outpatient clinics (n = 20; 71 %) were rated as high by the outpatient clinic directors. Nearly all directors reported networking with in-clinic facilities (n = 27; 96 %), with primary care physicians and with specialists in private practice (n = 21; 75 %, respectively).The main focus of care is pneumology. Internal medicine, psychiatry/psychosomatics and neurology are also equally represented. Our data further suggest a high demand for Post-COVID outpatient clinics and the need to expand this care offer.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternal MedicineMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38621680
PMCPMC11018383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.