Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38621422›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2024

Would banning menthol cigarettes, flavored cigars, and flavored e-cigarettes prompt users to seek illicit channels for obtaining them in the United States?

Yong Yang, Eric N Lindblom, Kenneth D Ward, Ramzi G Salloum

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yong YangSchool of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, United States of America. Electronic address: Yyang15@memphis.edu.
Eric N LindblomO'Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC 20001, United States of America.
Kenneth D WardCollege of Population Health, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, United States of America.
Ramzi G SalloumDepartment of Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States of America.
Georgetown University · USUniversity of Florida Health · USUniversity of Memphis · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Research Project 3: Modeling the Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Polytobacco Use and Associated Health DisparitiesU54CA229974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Abigail S. Friedman · 2018 to 2026
$39.2M
Modeling the impact of flavor bans among young adult tobacco users using discrete choice experiments and agent-based modelingR03DA048460 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI YANG, YONG · 2019 to 2020
$144k
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229974NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA048460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBanning flavors in tobacco and nicotine products may reduce youth initiation and prompt quit attempts but such bans may lead to illicit markets. We examined how likely current users would be to seek flavored products from illicit channels under various ban scenarios.

methodsCross-sectional surveys of 2552 current users of menthol cigarettes or flavored cigars and 2347 users of flavored e-cigarettes were conducted between 2021 and 2022 in the United States. For each ban scenario, respondents reported if they would have intentions to seek the banned flavored products from any illicit channels and identified the specific illicit channel they would consider. Logistic regressions were used to estimate how the likelihood of having intentions to seek illicit channels was associated with demographics, ban scenarios, and status of tobacco use.

resultsUnder various ban scenarios, 24-30% of people who smoked said they would seek illicit channels to obtain the banned products compared with 21-41% of dual users and 35-39% of users of flavored e-cigarettes. Online retailers were favored by people who smoked while users of flavored e-cigarettes favored local retailers. Heavy users were more likely to say they would try illicit channels. Under bans restricting more types of flavored tobacco products, users would be less likely to try illegal channels.

conclusionsA significant proportion of users of flavored tobacco and nicotine products would not reject using illicit banned products. Tailored programs are needed to apply to the groups with a higher risk of seeking illicit channels for banned products.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFlavoring AgentsMentholTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultCommerceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung AdultFlavoring AgentsMentholFlavor banFlavored cigarsFlavored e-cigarettesIllicit channelsIllicit marketMenthol cigarettes

Identifiers

PMID38621422
PMCPMC11088487
OpenAlexW4394835929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.