Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3862123›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1985

Visualization of the protein associations in the erythrocyte membrane skeleton.

T J Byers, D Branton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1985. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 398 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Reticulocyte Maturation.Membranes · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Nucleic Acid Delivery with Red-Blood-Cell-Based Carriers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T J Byers
D Branton
Harvard University · US

Funding

Training in Molecular, Cellular, and Chemical BiologyT32GM007598 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI DULAC, CATHERINE · 1985 to 2019
$16.2M
MOLECULAR STUDIES OF RED BLOOD CELL SPECTRINR01HL017411 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI BRANTON, DANIEL · 1985 to 1997
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-17411NIGMS NIH HHS 5T32GM07598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have obtained clear images of the erythrocyte membrane skeleton from negatively stained preparations that originate directly from the intact cell but in which the spectrin meshwork is artificially spread to allow close inspection. Our procedure requires less than 2 min at 5 degrees C in phosphate buffers. We find 200-nm-long spectrin tetramers crosslinked by junctional complexes. Each junction contains a regular 37-nm rod, probably an actin oligomer of approximately 13 monomers. Densities appear at variable places in the meshwork but distinct globules occur with great frequency 78 nm from the spectrin tetramer's junctional insertion end, very close to the known binding site for ankyrin. Most frequently, five or six spectrin tetramers insert into each junction, producing a meshwork that displays remarkably regular long range order.

Indexed as

ActinsSpectrinCytoskeletonErythrocyte MembraneHumansMacromolecular SubstancesMicroscopy, ElectronProtein BindingActinsMacromolecular SubstancesSpectrin

Identifiers

PMID3862123
PMCPMC391010
OpenAlexW1965782093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.