ArticleZebrafish2024
A 3D-Printed and Freely Available Device to Measure the Zebrafish Optokinetic Response Before and After Injury.
Article in Zebrafish, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Xenosialylation as immunological chimerism: a host-centered unifying model for viral and post-vaccination immune complications.European cytokine network · 2026Review
- HealthAge: evaluation of intrinsic capacity changes in humans, mice, and killifish to explore the biology of aging.GeroScience · 2026Review
- A Multimodal Single-Cell Epigenomic and 3D Genome Atlas of the Human Basal Ganglia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Environmental context modulates sociability in ube3a zebrafish mutants via alterations in sensory pathways.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Optimized in vivo two-photon imaging reveals the essential role of the contralateral eye in functional optic nerve regeneration in zebrafish larvae.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2025Article
- Zebrafish larva interface: an accessible, modular platform forFrontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Zebrafish eyes are anatomically similar to humans and have a higher percentage of cone photoreceptors more akin to humans than most rodent models, making them a beneficial model organism for studying vision. However, zebrafish are different in that they can regenerate their optic nerve after injury, which most other animals cannot. Vision in zebrafish and many other vertebrate animals, including humans, can be accessed using the optokinetic response (OKR), which is an innate eye movement that occurs when tracking an object. Because fish cannot use an eye chart, we utilize the OKR that is present in virtually all vertebrates to determine if a zebrafish has vision. To this end, we have developed an inexpensive OKR setup that uses 3D-printed and off-the-shelf parts. This setup has been designed and used by undergraduate researchers and is also scalable to a classroom laboratory setup. We demonstrate that this setup is fully functional for assessing the OKR, and we use it to illustrate the return of the OKR following optic nerve injury in adult zebrafish.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.