Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38620977›Full record

ArticleTrends in anaesthesia & critical care2022

Satisfaction with telemedicine among anesthesiologists during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Uchenna O Umeh, Fiona Roediger, Germaine Cuff, Yevgeniy Romanenko, Ansara Vaz, Arthur Hertling

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in anaesthesia & critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Uchenna O UmehDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 301 east 17th street, Rm C2-222, New York, NY, 10003, United States.
Fiona RoedigerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 301 east 17th street, Rm C2-222, New York, NY, 10003, United States.
Germaine CuffDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 301 east 17th street, Rm C2-222, New York, NY, 10003, United States.
Yevgeniy RomanenkoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 301 east 17th street, Rm C2-222, New York, NY, 10003, United States.
Ansara VazDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 301 east 17th street, Rm C2-222, New York, NY, 10003, United States.
Arthur HertlingDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 301 east 17th street, Rm C2-222, New York, NY, 10003, United States.
New York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly changed the way that health care providers interact with patients, particularly through the widespread implementation of telemedicine. Previous studies in other medical specialties have examined the role of telemedicine and physician satisfaction with the modality [1], but no such studies have been reported in the field of anesthesiology. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the scope of use and satisfaction with telemedicine among anesthesiologists who were ASA and ESAIC members. We developed a survey that was sent out to anesthesia providers through the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) and the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA). The survey was open for the duration of 30 days, after which it was closed and no new responses could be generated. The survey comprised three major sections and examined, (1) the characteristics of the anesthesia providers, (2) the settings within which they were using telemedicine, and (3) their satisfaction with the experience. We performed analyses to determine if there was a significant difference in satisfaction for those who used telemedicine prior to COVID-19 compared to those who started using it during the pandemic. There were a total of 708 responses from various provider demographics. Satisfaction with developing patient rapport was higher than satisfaction with airway and physical exam. Providers who were using telemedicine before the pandemic had consistently higher rates of satisfaction across all the subcategories. Familiarity with the software could have played a role in this result. Overall, satisfaction among users was high and the majority of practitioners, 86.3%, plan to continue using telemedicine in their practice.

Identifiers

PMID38620977
PMCPMC9170615
OpenAlexW4281928336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.