Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38620930›Full record

ArticleHealthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.)2021

SCORECOVID: A Python Package Index for scoring the individual policies against COVID-19.

Yoshiyasu Takefuji

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Policy analysis and data mining tools for controlling COVID-19 policies.Network modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sustainable policy: Don't get infected and don't infect others.Journal of hazardous materials advances · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Deathdaily: A Python Package Index for predicting the number of daily COVID-19 deaths.Network modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoshiyasu TakefujiFaculty of Data Science, Musashino University, 3-3-3 Ariake Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8181, Japan.
Musashino University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes SCORECOVID, a new Python Package Index (PyPI) for scoring individual policies against covid-19 and mitigating the pandemic. The new PyPI package consists of two modules. The first module automatically scrapes the latest information on the number of deaths and population by COVID-19 to score individual policies for a given country. The second module calculates the score by dividing the number of deaths by the population in millions. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the US estimates the economic value of a statistical life to be $9.5 million per individual. The higher the number of deaths, the greater the economic loss. To use the best policies to reduce the number of deaths, we should adopt measures and methods from exceptional countries with high scores. The proposed method reveals two groups: a high-scored group and a low-scored group. The number of deaths is an indicator of economic and health policy scores. SCORECOVID is the world's first open-source policy scoring tool for COVID-19. It is designed to help many countries utilize state-of-the-art analytics methods to effectively mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19MitigationOpen-source softwarePandemicPython Package Index (PyPI)Scoring policy

Identifiers

PMID38620930
PMCPMC8457900
OpenAlexW3201142536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.