Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38620921›Full record

ArticleTrends in anaesthesia & critical care2021

Prognosis of patients with tracheal intubation in the emergency department.

Ali Sarbazi-Golezari, Peyman Namdar, Shiva Yousefian, Monirsadat Mirzadeh, Afsaneh Farnood, Ehsan Modirian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in anaesthesia & critical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ali Sarbazi-GolezariStudent Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Peyman NamdarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Shiva YousefianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Monirsadat MirzadehMetabolic Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Afsaneh FarnoodDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Ehsan ModirianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intubation of critically ill patients is one of the increasing emergency procedures. We designed this study to determine age and sex-related mortality rates after emergency intubation. Methods: This retrospective study collected and analyzed non-trauma intubated patients in a referral hospital from the years 2017-2019 and before the appearance of COVID-19. Patients who were intubated outside of emergency by EMS technicians were excluded. We recorded data of intubated patients, like sex, age, length of being intubated and final diagnosis. P values of less than 0.05 were significant. Results: Data of 520 non-trauma intubated patients were collected and analyzed. More than 64% of the patients were over 65 years old and had a higher mortality rate (86.7%; P < 0.001) than younger patients. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 80%. More than three quarters of the decedents died within a week of intubation (P < 0.001). There was no significant relationship between sex and mortality rate (P = 0.535). Conclusion: Our data showed that with increased age there was a decrease in the chance of being extubated.

Indexed as

Emergency medicineICUIntubationMortality

Identifiers

PMID38620921
PMCPMC8321958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.