Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38620883›Full record

ReviewCarbon trends2021

Declining carbon emission/concentration during COVID-19: A critical review on temporary relief.

Arpita Adhikari, Joydip Sengupta, Chaudhery Mustansar Hussain

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Carbon trends, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Indirect Impacts of COVID-19 on the Environment: A Global Review.International journal of biomedical and clinical analysis · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Arpita AdhikariDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Techno Main Salt Lake, Kolkata 700091, India.
Joydip SenguptaDepartment of Electronic Science, Jogesh Chandra Chaudhuri College, Kolkata 700033, India.
Chaudhery Mustansar HussainDepartment of Chemistry and Environmental Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, 07102, NJ, USA.
New Jersey Institute of Technology · USTechno India University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In December 2019 the deadly pandemic COVID-19 traumatized mankind through its lethal impact. To seize the outbreak, nationwide/region-based lockdown strategies were adopted by most of the COVID-19 affected countries. This in turn resulted in restricted transportation via surface, water, and air, as well as significantly reduced working hours of the industry sectors, so on and so forth. The obvious outcome was a sudden discernible decline in atmospheric adulteration. Accordingly, the anthropogenic emissions at the global and regional/local scales were examined during the lockdown period by several researchers using both or either satellite-based and ground-based monitoring. Among several other air-contaminants, carbon has a dominant toxicological profile causing adverse health effects and thereby attracting researches interest in carbon-release probing during the systematic confinement period imposed by the ruling authorities across the globe. The results of those studies indicated a confirmed decline in carbon emission/concentration making the air more breathable for the period. In this review, the studies related to anthropogenic emissions of carbon during the lockdown period are accounted for by compiling the recently reported data from published articles.

Indexed as

Black carbonCarbon dioxideCarbon emission/concentrationCarbon monoxideCOVID-19

Identifiers

PMID38620883
PMCPMC8590614
OpenAlexW3211985004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.