ArticleIFAC-PapersOnLine2020
A Nonlinear Hysteretic Model for Automated Prediction of Lung Mechanics during Mechanical Ventilation.
Article in IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated evaluation of typical patient-ventilator asynchronies based on lung hysteretic responses.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is core intensive care unit (ICU) therapy during the Covid-19 pandemic. Optimising MV care to a specific patient with respiratory failure is difficult due to inter- and intra- patient variability in lung mechanics and condition. The ability to accurately predict patient-specific lung response to a change in MV settings would enable semi-automated care and significantly improve the efficiency of MV monitoring and care. It has particular emphasis when considering MV care required to treat Covid-19 patients, who require longer MV care, where patient-specific care can reduce the time on MV required. This study develops a nonlinear smooth hysteresis loop model (HLM) able to capture the essential lung dynamics in a patient-specific fashion from measured ventilator data, particularly for changes of compliance and infection points of the pressure-volume loop. The automated (no human input) hysteresis loop analysis (HLA) method is applied to identify HLM model parameters, enabling automated digital cloning to create a virtual patient model to accurately predict lung response at a specified positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) level, as well as in response to the changes of PEEP. The performance of this automated digital cloning approach is assessed using clinical data from 4 patients and 8 recruitment maneuver (RM) arms. Validation results show the HLM-based hysteresis loops identified using HLA match clinical pressure-volume loops very well with root-mean-square (RMS) errors less than 2% for all 8 data sets over 4 patients, validating the accuracy of the developed HLM in capturing the essential lung physiology and respiratory behaviours at different patient conditions. More importantly, the patient-specific digital clones at lower PEEP levels accurately predict lung response at higher PEEP levels with predicted peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) errors less than 2% in average. In addition, the resulted additional lung volume
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.