Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38620830›Full record

ArticleTrends in anaesthesia & critical care2021

Prone transportation to an ECMO center.

Anton Nikouline, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, John T Granton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in anaesthesia & critical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anton NikoulineDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Lorenzo Del SorboInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John T GrantonInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) accounts for 10% of all intensive care unit admissions and mortality remains exceedingly high ranging from 35 to 46%. Prone positioning has demonstrated benefit as a treatment option in the moderate to severe subset of ARDS patients. Referral to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) center remains the standard of care for patients with refractory hypoxemia. Transfer of these already critically ill patients is high risk but there is a possibility for improved oxygenation on transport with prone positioning. Currently there is limited data on the safe transportation of prone patients to ECMO centers. Herein we describe a case of an ARDS patient safely transported prone with minimal ad hoc adjustments to standard ambulance transport.

Indexed as

Critical careExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationProne positionReferral and consultationRespiratory distress syndrome

Identifiers

PMID38620830
PMCPMC8091736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.