Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38620813›Full record

ArticleInternet of things (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

iCovidCare: Intelligent health monitoring framework for COVID-19 using ensemble random forest in edge networks.

Mainak Adhikari, Ambigavathi Munusamy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet of things (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mainak AdhikariMobile & Cloud Lab, Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Estonia.
Ambigavathi MunusamyDepartment of ECE, CEG Campus, Anna University, Chennai, India.
Anna University, Chennai · INUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak is in its growing stage due to the lack of standard diagnosis for the patients. In recent times, various models with machine learning have been developed to predict and diagnose novel coronavirus. However, the existing models fail to take an instant decision for detecting the COVID-19 patient immediately and cannot handle multiple medical sensor data for disease prediction. To handle such challenges, we propose an intelligent health monitoring and prediction framework, namely the iCovidCare model for predicting the health status of COVID-19 patients using the ensemble Random Forest (eRF) technique in edge networks. In the proposed framework, a rule-based policy is designed on the local edge devices to detect the risk factor of a patient immediately using monitoring Temperature sensor values. The real-time health monitoring parameters of different medical sensors are transmitted to the centralized cloud servers for future health prediction of the patients. The standard eRF technique is used to predict the health status of the patients using the proposed data fusion and feature selection strategy by selecting the most significant features for disease prediction. The proposed iCovidCare model is evaluated with a synthetic COVID-19 dataset and compared with the standard classification models based on various performance matrices to show its effectiveness. The proposed model has achieved 95.13% accuracy, which is higher than the standard classification models.

Indexed as

COVID-19Disease predictionEdge networkseRF classification modelFeature selectionHealth monitoring

Identifiers

PMID38620813
PMCPMC7943395
OpenAlexW3134331338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.