ArticleThrombosis update2021
Antiplatelet therapy in patients with Covid-19: A retrospective observational study.
Article in Thrombosis update, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracardiac Prothrombotic Effects of COVID-19.Heart failure clinics · 2023Review
- Extracardiac Prothrombotic Effects of COVID-19.Cardiology clinics · 2022Review
- COVID-19 associated coagulopathy: Mechanisms and host-directed treatment.The American journal of the medical sciences · 2022Review
- Therapeutic strategies to fight COVID-19: Which is the status artis?British journal of pharmacology · 2022Review
- Aspirin in COVID-19: Pros and Cons.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Association of clinical characteristics, antidiabetic and cardiovascular agents with diabetes mellitus and COVID-19: a 7-month follow-up cohort study.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2021Article
- Pre-hospital antiplatelet medication use on COVID-19 disease severity.Heart & lung : the journal of critical careArticle
- Perioperative anesthesia challenges and outcomes of patients with Rhino-Orbito-Cerebral Mucormycosis during the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Covid-19 is associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism. In addition, cases of arterial thromboembolism were also reported. We investigated the effect of antiplatelet therapy on the disease course. Methods: We evaluated a cohort of inpatients with Covid-19 (n = 152). We recorded the patient's demographic data, their comorbidities, medication use including the use of antiplatelets and anticoagulants, laboratory findings and data about mechanical ventilation. We then separated the patient's outcomes into either being "bad" (dead or referral to higher level of care) or "good" (discharged). Then we evaluated the factors that contributed to the patient needing ventilatory support and to showing typical radiological findings. Results: In our cohort, 21 patients received ventilatory support whereas 131 did not require the use of ventilators. 127 patients had good outcomes and 25 had bad outcomes. By using multivariate analysis, we found that the need for ventilatory support was the strongest predictor of a bad outcome. All patients who were on ventilators displayed typical radiological findings. The factors predicting the need for ventilatory support were LDH and CRP levels, the presence of cardiac conduction abnormalities as well as chronic lung conditions. Cardiac conduction abnormalities, LDH and CRP levels, and the use of antiplatelets, were factors that predicted typical radiological findings. Conclusions: There was a higher incidence of typical radiological findings in patients on antiplatelet medication. However, it did not translate into changes in the ventilation requirement or in the outcome. The need for mechanical ventilation was the strongest predictor of a bad outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.