ArticleIFAC-PapersOnLine2021
On the effect of the number of tests and their time of application in tracing policies against COVID-19.
Article in IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modelling effectiveness of COVID-19 pandemic control policies using an Area-based SEIR model with consideration of infection during interzonal travel.Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper we explore the effect of the number of daily tests on an epidemics control policy purely based on testing and selective quarantine, and the impact of these actions depending on the time their application starts. We introduce a general model incorporating a stochastic disease evolution, a particular weighted graph representing the population, and an optimal contact tracing strategy to allocate available tests. Simulations on a community of 50'000 individuals show that the evolution of the epidemic produces a clear non-linear response to the variation of the number of tests used and to the starting time of their application. These results suggest that not only a minimum number of tests is necessary to obtain a positive outcome from the tracing strategy but also that there exists a saturation on the contribution of additional tests. The results also show that the timing in the application of the measures is as important as the measures themselves and that an excessive delay can be hardly overcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.