Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38620556›Full record

ArticleCase studies in chemical and environmental engineering2020

Considerations on water quality and the use of chlorine in times of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic in the community.

Fernando García-Ávila, Lorgio Valdiviezo-Gonzales, Manuel Cadme-Galabay, Horacio Gutiérrez-Ortega, Luis Altamirano-Cárdenas, César Zhindón- Arévalo, Lisveth Flores Del Pino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case studies in chemical and environmental engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando García-ÁvilaFacultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad de Cuenca, Ecuador.
Lorgio Valdiviezo-GonzalesSchool of Environmental Engineering, Universidad César Vallejo, San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima, Peru.
Manuel Cadme-GalabayUnidad Académica de Salud y Bienestar, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Sede Azogues, Ecuador.
Horacio Gutiérrez-OrtegaUnidad Académica de Salud y Bienestar, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Sede Azogues, Ecuador.
Luis Altamirano-CárdenasUnidad Académica de Salud y Bienestar, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Sede Azogues, Ecuador.
César Zhindón- ArévaloUnidad Académica de Salud y Bienestar, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Sede Azogues, Ecuador.
Lisveth Flores Del PinoFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Peru.
Universidad Católica de Cuenca · ECNational Agrarian University · PEUniversidad César Vallejo · PEUniversity of Cuenca · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review goal is to reflect on the challenges and prospects for water quality in the face of the pandemic caused by the new SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19). Based on the information available so far, the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater has raised interest in using it as an early warning method, to detect the resurgence of infections and to report the risk associated with contracting SARS-CoV-2 in contact with untreated water or inadequately treated wastewater is discharged. The wastewater-based epidemiological approach can be used as an early indicator of infection within a specific population. On the other hand, it is necessary to collect information from the managers of drinking water supply companies and professionals who are related to water quality, to know SARS-CoV-2 data and information, and its influence on drinking water quality. The basic purpose of this review article is to try to provide a valuable and quick reference guide to COVID-19. Important topics were discussed, such as detection of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater in various parts of the world; wastewater screening to monitor COVID-19; persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in aquatic systems; the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in drinking water; clean water as a mechanism to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic; chlorine as a disinfectant to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 and damage to ecosystems by the use of chlorine. Currently does not exist extensive literature on the effectiveness of water and wastewater treatment processes that ensure the correct elimination of SARS-CoV-2. Excessive use of disinfectants such as chlorine is causing effects on the environment. This document highlights the need for further research to establish the behavior of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in aquatic systems. This study presents an early overview of the observed and potential impacts of COVID-19 on the environment.

Indexed as

ChlorineCOVID-19EpidemiologySARS-CoV-2Viral disseminationWastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID38620556
PMCPMC7556225
OpenAlexW3093178108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.