Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38620435›Full record

ReviewTrends in anaesthesia & critical care2020

Is the prone position indicated in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 during the peri-operative period?

Carlos Darcy Alves Bersot, Rafael Mercante Linhares, Jose Eduardo Guimarães Pereira, Carlos Galhardo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in anaesthesia & critical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos Darcy Alves BersotDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital Federal da Lagoa, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rafael Mercante LinharesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital Miguel Couto, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jose Eduardo Guimarães PereiraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Valença Medical School, Valença, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carlos GalhardoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital São Lucas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS · BRUniversidade Federal de Roraima · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2 are a large family of viruses that cause illnesses ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases. A SARS-CoV-2 is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans. The majority of critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units with confirmed severe infection with SARS-CoV-2 developed an acute respiratory distress like syndrome. The main objective of this opinion paper is to raise the discussion about the possible benefit of keeping the patient with COVID-19 disease and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) in the prone position during the perioperative period, especially where this position is not a required factor for the surgical or invasive procedure. We believe that the prone position, due to its favorable pulmonary physiology, can improve the V̇/Q̇ ratio in the perioperative period.

Indexed as

Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF)AnesthesiaCritical carePEEPProne positionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38620435
PMCPMC7299854
OpenAlexW3035897736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.