Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38620319›Full record

ArticleJournal of water process engineering2021

Diatoms recovery from wastewater: Overview from an ecological and economic perspective.

Abhishek Saxena, Archana Tiwari, Rinku Kaushik, Hafiz M N Iqbal, Roberto Parra-Saldívar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of water process engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Seasonal Variation in theEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abhishek SaxenaDiatoms Research Laboratory, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, UP, 201301, India.
Archana TiwariDiatoms Research Laboratory, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, UP, 201301, India.
Rinku KaushikDiatoms Research Laboratory, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, UP, 201301, India.
Hafiz M N IqbalTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, 64849, Mexico.
Roberto Parra-SaldívarTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, 64849, Mexico.
Amity University · INTecnológico de Monterrey · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alarming water pollution is toxic to the aquatic ecosystem leading to a sharp decline in species diversity. Diatoms have great potency to survive in contaminated water bodies, hence they can be compelling bioindicators to monitor the change in the environmental matrices effectively. Around the globe, researchers are intended to evaluate the impact of pollution on the diatoms recovery and techniques used for the assessment. The diatoms are precious for futuristic need viz. value-added products, energy generation, pharmaceuticals, and aquaculture feedstocks. All these applications led to a significant rise in diatoms research among the scientific community. This review presents different isolation practices, cultivation, and other challenges associated with the diatoms. A precise focus is given to diatoms isolation techniques from highly polluted water bodies with the main thrust towards obtaining an axenic culture to elucidate the significance of pure diatom cultures. Recovery of "

Indexed as

Axenic cultureBioindicatorsDiatomsIsolationMicroalgaeWastewater

Identifiers

PMID38620319
PMCPMC7562967
OpenAlexW3093421254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.