Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38620182›Full record

ReviewDrug discovery today. Technologies2006

Advances in virtual screening.

Ingo Muegge, Scott Oloff

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug discovery today. Technologies, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. New flavone-based arylamides as potentialJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Multi-task generative topographic mapping in virtual screening.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Congestion game scheduling for virtual drug screening optimization.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ingo MueggeBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., 900 Ridgebury Road, Ridgefield, P.O. Box 368, CT 06877-368, USA.
Scott OloffBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., 900 Ridgebury Road, Ridgefield, P.O. Box 368, CT 06877-368, USA.
Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the term virtual screening as the

Identifiers

PMID38620182
PMCPMC7105922
OpenAlexW1967026937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.