ArticleThrombosis update2023
Applications of rotational thromboelastometry in heparin monitoring in critical COVID-19 disease: Observations in the Maastricht Intensive Care COVID cohort.
Article in Thrombosis update, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- FXII decline during cardiopulmonary bypass and the limits of routine coagulation assays: a prospective observational analysis.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Monitoring unfractionated heparin in ECMO and cardiac surgery: the search for a valid reference standard.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- [Point of care coagulation diagnostics-Absolutely necessary or only a reasonable supplement?]Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Review
- The Maastricht Intensive Care COVID Cohort: A Critical Appraisal of the Predefined Research Questions.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Critically ill COVID-19 patients are at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Therefore, they receive thromboprophylaxis and, when appropriate, therapeutic unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). To monitor heparins in COVID-19 disease, whole-blood rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may be a promising alternative to the aPTT and anti-Xa assays. Objective: To evaluate the ROTEM INTEM/HEPTEM ratios in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients treated with UFH and therapeutic LMWH. Material and methods: A subcohort of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients of the prospective Maastricht Intensive Care Covid (MaastrICCht) cohort was studied. Anti-Xa, aPTT, and ROTEM measurements following treatment with UFH or therapeutic dose of LMWH (nadroparin) were evaluated using uni- and multivariable linear regression analysis and receiver operating characteristics. Results: A total of 98 patients were included, of which 82 were treated with UFH and 16 with therapeutic LMWH. ROTEM-measured INTEM/HEPTEM CT ratio was higher in patients using UFH (1.4 [1.3-1.4]) compared to patients treated with LMWH (1.0 [1.0-1.1], p < 0.001). Both the aPTT and anti-Xa were associated with the CT ratio. However, the β-regression coefficient (95%CI) was significantly higher in patients on UFH (0.31 (0.001-0.62)) compared to therapeutic LMWH (0.09 (0.05-0.13)) for comparison with the anti-Xa assay. Furthermore, ROC analysis demonstrated an area under the curve for detecting UFH of 0.936(0.849-1.00), 0.851(0.702-1.000), and 0.645(0.465-0.826) for the CT ratio, aPTT, and anti-Xa, respectively. Conclusion: The ROTEM INTEM/HEPTEM CT ratio appears a promising tool to guide anticoagulant therapy in ICU patients with COVID-19 disease, but associations with clinical endpoints are currently lacking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.