ArticleEuropean economic review2023
Between lives and economy: COVID-19 containment policy in open economies.
Article in European economic review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The hammer and the jab: Are COVID-19 lockdowns and vaccinations complements or substitutes?European journal of operational research · 2023Article
- Save lives or save livelihoods? A cross-country analysis of COVID-19 pandemic and economic growth.Journal of economic behavior & organization · 2022Article
- From SARS to COVID-19: The evolving role of China-ASEAN production network.Economic modelling · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper studies containment policies for combating a pandemic in an open-economy context. It does so via quantitative analyses using a model that incorporates a standard epidemiological compartmental model in a general equilibrium multi-country, multi-sector Ricardian model of international trade with input-output linkages. We quantitatively evaluate the long-run welfare and real-income losses due to the short-run pandemic shocks, and we study the role of trade in these effects. We devise a novel approach to computing national optimal policies. We find that (1) the long-run welfare and real-income losses due to just two years of pandemic shocks are substantial; (2) international trade helps buffer both the welfare and real-income losses, and it also saves lives; (3) the computed optimal policies indicate that most countries should have tightened their containment measures relative to what was done; and (4) compared to the case of autarky, the optimal policy under trade is generally more stringent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.