Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38620033›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2024

Lineage frequency time series reveal elevated levels of genetic drift in SARS-CoV-2 transmission in England.

QinQin Yu, Joao A Ascensao, Takashi Okada, COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium, Olivia Boyd, Erik Volz, Oskar Hallatschek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rapid evolution reveals long-range spread of SARS-CoV-2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. The evolution of genetic drift over 50,000 generations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Uncovering heterogeneous intercommunity disease transmission from neutral allele frequency time series.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Proliferating active matter.Nature reviews. Physics · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

QinQin YuDepartment of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0838-3670
Joao A AscensaoDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Takashi OkadaDepartment of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium
Olivia BoydMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Erik VolzMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Oskar HallatschekDepartment of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1312-5975

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic drift in infectious disease transmission results from randomness of transmission and host recovery or death. The strength of genetic drift for SARS-CoV-2 transmission is expected to be high due to high levels of superspreading, and this is expected to substantially impact disease epidemiology and evolution. However, we don't yet have an understanding of how genetic drift changes over time or across locations. Furthermore, noise that results from data collection can potentially confound estimates of genetic drift. To address this challenge, we develop and validate a method to jointly infer genetic drift and measurement noise from time-series lineage frequency data. Our method is highly scalable to increasingly large genomic datasets, which overcomes a limitation in commonly used phylogenetic methods. We apply this method to over 490,000 SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences from England collected between March 2020 and December 2021 by the COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) consortium and separately infer the strength of genetic drift for pre-B.1.177, B.1.177, Alpha, and Delta. We find that even after correcting for measurement noise, the strength of genetic drift is consistently, throughout time, higher than that expected from the observed number of COVID-19 positive individuals in England by 1 to 3 orders of magnitude, which cannot be explained by literature values of superspreading. Our estimates of genetic drift suggest low and time-varying establishment probabilities for new mutations, inform the parametrization of SARS-CoV-2 evolutionary models, and motivate future studies of the potential mechanisms for increased stochasticity in this system.

Indexed as

COVID-19Genetic DriftSARS-CoV-2EnglandGenome, ViralHumansPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID38620033
PMCPMC11045146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.