Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38619925›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Symptomatic Presbyopia may Develop Earlier in Patients With Glaucoma-A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Cohort Study.

Masahiko Ayaki, Akiko Hanyuda, Kazuno Negishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masahiko AyakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko HanyudaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuno NegishiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore risk factors for symptomatic presbyopia, defined as near add power ≥1.50 diopters, in patients with glaucoma. Methods: Treated glaucoma (n = 56), untreated glaucoma (n = 21), and control individuals (n = 376), aged 40 to 55 years at first visit, were enrolled in the study, and near add power, retinal thickness, and visual field were examined. The association between near add power and ocular parameters and the odds ratios (ORs) for symptomatic presbyopia were investigated. Survival analysis for symptomatic presbyopia was conducted. Results: Age, astigmatic power, mean deviation, and ganglion cell complex thickness were associated with near add power. The OR for symptomatic presbyopia was significant for age (OR = 1.51), astigmatism (OR = 1.01), mean deviation (OR = 0.72), ganglion cell complex thickness (OR = 0.98), treated and untreated glaucoma (OR = 2.09), and use of glaucoma eye drops (OR = 3.33). Survival analysis showed that the treated glaucoma group reached the near add power endpoint of ≥1.50 D (symptomatic presbyopia) significantly earlier than the other two groups, and there was no difference between the control and untreated glaucoma groups. Conclusions: Glaucoma patients treated with eye drops may start near correction earlier. Translational Relevance: Symptomatic presbyopia may develop earlier in patients with glaucoma, and our findings could further contribute to better management and understanding of presbyopia with glaucoma.

Indexed as

GlaucomaPresbyopiaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansOphthalmic SolutionsRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID38619925
PMCPMC11037495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.