Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38619805›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2024

Surgical Treatment and Outcomes for Gluteal Tendon Tears.

Allison Morgan, Michael Moore, Kendall Derry, Andrew Bi, Jahnya Brown, Thomas Youm, Daniel Kaplan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allison MorganOrthopaedic Department, Sports Medicine Division, NYU Langone Health, 301 E 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Michael MooreOrthopaedic Department, Sports Medicine Division, NYU Langone Health, 301 E 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Kendall DerryOrthopaedic Department, Sports Medicine Division, NYU Langone Health, 301 E 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Andrew BiOrthopaedic Department, Sports Medicine Division, NYU Langone Health, 301 E 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Jahnya BrownOrthopaedic Department, Sports Medicine Division, NYU Langone Health, 301 E 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Thomas YoumOrthopaedic Department, Sports Medicine Division, NYU Langone Health, 301 E 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Daniel KaplanOrthopaedic Department, Sports Medicine Division, NYU Langone Health, 301 E 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA. Danieljameskaplan@gmail.com.
NYU Langone Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewGluteus medius and minimus tears, or hip abductor tendon tears, are increasingly identified as a source of lateral hip pain. Once underappreciated and undertreated, they are now recognized as a cause of greater trochanteric pain syndrome and a pathology amenable to both nonoperative and operative modalities. This review summarizes relevant anatomy, clinical presentation, and treatment options for gluteus medius tears, focusing on surgical options. RECENT

findingsWhen surgical intervention is indicated, repair, reconstruction, or tendon transfer may be considered. Open and endoscopic repair techniques demonstrate similar outcomes with improvements in patient-reported outcomes and low complication and retear rates for both partial and full thickness tears. Variations in fixation construct and graft augmentations have been described, though clinical evidence remains limited to support specific techniques. Gluteus maximus transfer via open approach is a salvage option for the severely atrophied, retracted, or revision gluteus tendon; however, persistent limitations in abduction strength and gait abnormalities are common. Emerging evidence continues to evolve our understanding of surgical decision-making for gluteus tendon tears. The current literature supports either open or endoscopic repair techniques and open tendon transfer as a salvAage option. Further study is needed to determine the optimal fixation construct, the role of graft augmentation, and patient-related factors that influence postoperative outcomes.

Indexed as

Endoscopic gluteus repairGluteus maximus transferGluteus tendon tearGreater trochanteric pain syndromeHip abductor tendon tear

Identifiers

PMID38619805
PMCPMC11091023
OpenAlexW4394817805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.