Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38619788›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2024

Comparative Study on Anti-VEGF in Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Setting Based on Lean Methodology from the Bari Intravitreal Injection Registry (BIVIR).

Maria Oliva Grassi, Pasquale Viggiano, Enrico Borrelli, Giacomo Boscia, Teresa Molfetta, Maria Giovanna Malerba, Maria D'Addario, Ermete Giancipoli, Giovanni Alessio, Francesco Boscia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Oliva GrassiDIBRAIN Department, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, Bari, Italy. mariaolivagrassi@gmail.com.
Pasquale ViggianoDIBRAIN Department, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, Bari, Italy.
Enrico BorrelliVita-Salute San Raffaele University Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giacomo BosciaDIBRAIN Department, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, Bari, Italy.
Teresa MolfettaDIBRAIN Department, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, Bari, Italy.
Maria Giovanna MalerbaDIBRAIN Department, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, Bari, Italy.
Maria D'AddarioDIBRAIN Department, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, Bari, Italy.
Ermete GiancipoliUOC Oftalmologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Giovanni AlessioDIBRAIN Department, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, Bari, Italy.
Francesco BosciaDIBRAIN Department, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, Bari, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Foggia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOptimizing treatment protocols for wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) is an ongoing challenge, as it involves a delicate balance between achieving therapeutic efficacy and minimizing invasive procedures' frequency. This study aimed to apply the Lean methodology and evaluate the effectiveness of this new setting on intravitreal therapy for wAMD, employing different anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) drugs (bevacizumab, brolucizumab, aflibercept, ranibizumab), drawing data from the Bari Intravitreal Injections Registry (BIVIR).

methodsThis was a retrospective, monocentric, nonrandomized, comparative study. Lean methodology was employed to design the new setting and the BIVIR collected information from electronic medical records. Clinical data of four groups, stratified based on the first-line anti-VEGF agents used, were compared. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) changes were compared between the four groups at 3 and 12 months.

resultsOut of 4990 eyes and 41,323 intravitreal injections (IVs) recorded in BIVIR, 1421 eyes of 1182 patients were included. The mean number of IVs in first year was 6.1 ± 2.5, with no significant differences among the four subgroups. The mean change in BCVA was + 6.2 letters [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.6-6.8] after two IVs, and + 5.9 (95% CI 5.1-6.8) letters after three IVs; at three months, brolucizumab was associated with a greater mean increase in BCVA than bevacizumab (p = 0.050); aflibercept (p = 0.044) and ranibizumab p = 0.047). At the 1-year follow-up, the mean change was + 6.3 letters (95% CI 5.4-7.2), brolucizumab and ranibizumab were associated with a superior improvement in BCVA compared to aflibercept (p = 0.033). Regarding the CRT, a significant reduction was observed in the subgroup treated with brolucizumab at the 3-month follow-up, compared to bevacizumab (p = 0.003), aflibercept (p = 0.015), and ranibizumab (p < 0.001); Aflibercept exhibited a superior effect than ranibizumab (p = 0.001). At 1-year follow-up, aflibercept resulted in a more significant reduction of macular thickness compared to ranibizumab (p = 0.016) while no significant differences were observed among the other drugs.

conclusionsOur practical experience showed the effectiveness of the new setting in the treatment of wAMD. This comparative study at 1 year suggested a predominant brolucizumab efficacy on functional outcomes. In addition, brolucizumab and aflibercept appeared to have similar efficacy in fluid control.

Indexed as

AMDAnti-VEGFBrolucizumabIntravitreal injection registryLean methodology

Identifiers

PMID38619788
PMCPMC11109068
OpenAlexW4394819642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.