Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38619757›Full record

SynthesisHeart failure reviews2024

Resistance is not futile: a systematic review of the benefits, mechanisms and safety of resistance training in people with heart failure.

Bradley A Morris, Ronak Sinaei, Neil A Smart

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Heart failure reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07118410 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Resistance Exercise With Blood Flow Restriction by Vascular Occlusion on Myocardial Function in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRan2025 to 2027Enrolled38ConditionsHeart Failure, Ventricular Function, LeftArmsApplication of a vascular restriction device during resistance training
NCT07613762 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Use on Exercise Tolerance and Physical Performance in Heart Failure Patients Enrolled in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: A Randomized Crossover Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de Santiago de ChileRan2026 to 2027Enrolled28ConditionsHeart Failure, Exercise Tolerance (Measured in Minutes), Cardiac RehabilitationArmsHigh-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bradley A MorrisUniversity of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2350, Australia.
Ronak SinaeiUniversity of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2350, Australia.
Neil A SmartUniversity of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2350, Australia. nsmart54@gmail.com.
University of New England · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise offers many physical and health benefits to people with heart failure (CHF), but aerobic training (AT) predominates published literature. Resistance training (RT) provides additional and complementary health benefits to AT in people with CHF; we aimed to elucidate specific health benefits accrued, the mechanism of effect and safety of RT. We conducted a systematic search for RT randomised, controlled trials in people with CHF, up until August 30, 2023. RT offers several benefits including improved physical function (peak VO

Indexed as

Heart FailureQuality of LifeResistance TrainingExercise ToleranceHumansMuscle StrengthCardiomyopathyResistance trainingStrength training

Identifiers

PMID38619757
PMCPMC11189316
OpenAlexW4394809614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.