Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38619689›Full record

ArticlePsicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS2024

Psychometric network analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in Paraguayan general population.

Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Aaron Travezaño-Cabrera, Julio Torales, Iván Barrios, Lindsey W Vilca, Antonio Samaniego-Pinho, Rodrigo Moreta-Herrera, Mario Reyes-Bossio, Nicol A Barria-Asenjo, Jesús Ayala-Colqui and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Tomás Caycho-RodríguezFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Científica del Sur, Campus Villa II, Ctra. Panamericana S 19, Villa EL Salvador, Lima, Peru. tcaycho@cientifica.edu.pem.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5349-7570
Aaron Travezaño-CabreraEscuela de Psicología, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Perú.
Julio ToralesCátedra de Psicología Médica, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.
Iván BarriosInstituto Regional de Investigación en Salud, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay.
Lindsey W VilcaSouth American Center for Education and Research in Public Health, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
Antonio Samaniego-PinhoCarrera de Psicología, Facultad de Filosofía, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Asunción, Paraguay.
Rodrigo Moreta-HerreraEscuela de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Ambato, Ecuador.
Mario Reyes-BossioFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.
Nicol A Barria-AsenjoDepartamento de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno, Chile.
Jesús Ayala-ColquiUniversidad Tecnólogica del Perú, Lima, Peru.
Cirilo H Garcia-CadenaFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico.
National University of Rosario · ARPeruvian University of Applied Sciences · PEPontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador · ECUniversidad Autónoma de Nuevo León · MXUniversidad Científica del Sur · PEUniversidad de Los Lagos · CLUniversidad Nacional de Asunción · PYUniversidad Nacional De Caaguazú · PYUniversidad Norbert Wiener · PEUniversidad Peruana Unión · PEUniversidad Tecnológica del Perú · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression and anxiety are two of the most prevalent and disabling mental disorders worldwide, both in the general population and in outpatient clinical settings.

objectiveThis study aimed to analyze the psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) based on network analysis metrics.

methodsA total of 911 Paraguayans (23.71% women and 76.29% men; mean age 31.25 years, SD = 10.63), selected by non-probabilistic convenience sampling, participated in the study. Network analysis was used to evaluate the internal structure, reliability, and measurement invariance between men and women.

resultsThe results revealed that the PHQ-4 is a unidimensional measure through Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA). Reliability, through structural consistency, identified that 100% of the time, only a single dimension was obtained, and all items remained stable, as they were always replicated within the empirical dimension. The unidimensional structure has shown evidence of configural invariance; therefore, the network structure functioned equally among the different sex groups.

conclusionThe PHQ-4 presented optimal preliminary evidence of validity based on its internal structure, reliability, and invariance between sexes. Therefore, it may be useful as an accurate and brief measure of anxiety and depressive symptoms in the Paraguayan context.

Indexed as

InvarianceNetwork psychometric analysisPatient Health Questionnaire-4ReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID38619689
PMCPMC11018587
OpenAlexW4394808331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.