Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38619580›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2025

Frequency, characteristics and risk assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension with a left heart disease phenotype.

Matteo Toma, Giulio Savonitto, Carlo Maria Lombardi, Edoardo Airò, Mauro Driussi, Piero Gentile, Luke Howard, Martina Moschella, Emma Di Poi, Matteo Pagnesi and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Matteo TomaCardiovascular Disease Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS Italian Cardiovascular Network, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Giulio SavonittoCardiothoracovascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI) and University Hospital of Trieste, Via Valdoni 7, 34149, Trieste, Italy.
Carlo Maria LombardiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Edoardo AiròCardiology and Pneumology Division, Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio, Pisa, Italy.
Mauro DriussiCardiology, Cardiothoracic Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Udine, Italy.
Piero GentileDe Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Luke HowardFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, National Heart & Lung Institute, London, UK.
Martina MoschellaDivision of Cardiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Emma Di PoiDepartment of Medicine, Rheumatology Clinic, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Udine, Italy.
Matteo PagnesiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Simonetta MontiCardiology and Pneumology Division, Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio, Pisa, Italy.
Valentino ColliniCardiology, Cardiothoracic Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Udine, Italy.
Luciana D'AngeloDe Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Veronica VecchiatoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Alberto GiannoniCardiology and Pneumology Division, Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio, Pisa, Italy.
Marianna AdamoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Davide BarbisanCardiothoracovascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI) and University Hospital of Trieste, Via Valdoni 7, 34149, Trieste, Italy.
Carolina BauleoCardiology and Pneumology Division, Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea GarasciaDe Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Marco MetraDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Gianfranco SinagraCardiothoracovascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI) and University Hospital of Trieste, Via Valdoni 7, 34149, Trieste, Italy.
Francesco Lo GiudiceDepartment of Cardiology, National Pulmonary Hypertension Service, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.
Davide StolfoCardiothoracovascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI) and University Hospital of Trieste, Via Valdoni 7, 34149, Trieste, Italy. davide.stolfo@gmail.com.
Pietro AmeriCardiovascular Disease Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS Italian Cardiovascular Network, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy. pietroameri@unige.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7167-7287
Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITAzienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITHammersmith Hospital · GBOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITKarolinska Institutet · SEPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo obtain real-world evidence about the features and risk stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with a left heart disease (LHD) phenotype (PAH-LHD). METHODS AND

resultsBy reviewing the records of consecutive incident PAH patients at 7 tertiary centers from 2001 to 2021, we selected 286 subjects with all parameters needed to determine risk of death at baseline and at first follow-up with COMPERA and COMPERA 2.0 scores. Fifty seven (20%) had PAH-LHD according to the AMBITION definition. Compared with no-LHD ones, they were older, had higher BMI, more cardiovascular comorbidities, higher E/e' ratio and left atrial area, but lower BNP concentrations and better right ventricular function and pulmonary hemodynamics. Survival was comparable between PAH-LHD and no-LHD patients, although the former were less commonly treated with dual PAH therapy. Both COMPERA and COMPERA 2.0 discriminated all-cause mortality risk of PAH-LHD at follow-up, but not at baseline. Risk profile significantly improved during follow-up only when assessed by COMPERA 2.0. At multivariable analysis with low-risk status as reference, intermediate-high and high-risk, but not LHD phenotype, were associated with higher hazard of all-cause mortality. Results were comparable in secondary analyses including patients in the last 10 years and atrial fibrillation and echocardiographic abnormalities as additional criteria for PAH-LHD.

conclusionsIn real life, PAH-LHD patients are frequent, have less severe disease and are less likely treated with PAH drug combinations than no-LHD. The COMPERA 2.0 model may be more appropriate to evaluate their mortality risk during follow-up and how it is modulated by therapy.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Arterial HypertensionAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsComorbidityLeft heart diseasePrognosisPulmonary hypertensionRisk

Identifiers

PMID38619580
PMCPMC11839797
OpenAlexW4394808458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.