ArticleEuropean endodontic journal2024
Diclofenac Transdermal Patch versus Oral Diclofenac on Post Endodontic Pain and Quality of Life- A Randomised Clinical Trial.
Article in European endodontic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Analgesic Efficacy of Diclofenac and Ketoprofen Transdermal Patches Versus Ibuprofen Tablets for Pain Control After Initial Archwire Placement in Orthodontic Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Pain research & management · 2026Trial
- Comparative evaluation of the effect of various transdermal patches and oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on postoperative endodontic pain and quality of life - A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the effect of pre-treatment transdermal and oral diclofenac on post-endodontic pain level and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with apical periodontitis in mandibular molars following single visit root canal treatment.
methodsThis parallel-arm, randomised, double-blinded clinical trial is reported according to the Consoli-dated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2020 guidelines. The protocol was approved by the Institu-tional Ethical Committee on 30th March 2021 (MADC/IEC-I/029/2021) and registered at the clinical trial reg-istry of India (CTRI/2021/12/038696). Adult patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria were randomised into two groups. Group DTP received a diclofenac transdermal patch 100 mg, and Group DOT received a diclofenac oral tablet 100 mg one hour before root canal treatment. Pain scores were checked at baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the treatment. OHRQOL was assessed at baseline and one week after the treatment.
resultsBoth groups were associated with a significantly lower incidence of post-operative pain and im-proved OHRQOL. At 2 hours, the pain level was significantly lower with an oral diclofenac tablet, and at 24 hours, the pain level was significantly lower with a diclofenac transdermal patch. Regarding OHRQOL, there was no significant difference between the two groups.
conclusionWithin the limitations of this study, the diclofenac transdermal patch had lesser post-operative pain at 24 hours, whereas the oral diclofenac tablet had lesser pain at 2 hours.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.