ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024
Re-examining Correlations Between Synonymous Codon Usage and Protein Bond Angles in Escherichia coli.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synonymous Gene Recoding Affects the Accuracy of Protein Quantification Measurements.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
- Evolution and Functional Implications of Codon Usage Bias in Eukaryotes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Review
- The dependence of the amino acid backbone conformation on the translated synonymous codon is not statistically significant.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Rosenberg AA, Marx A, Bronstein AM (Codon-specific Ramachandran plots show amino acid backbone conformation depends on identity of the translated codon. Nat Commun. 2022:13:2815) recently found a surprising correlation between synonymous codon usage and the dihedral bond angles of the resulting amino acid. However, their analysis did not account for the strongest known correlate of codon usage: gene expression. We re-examined the relationship between bond angles and codon usage by applying the approach of Rosenberg et al. to simulated protein-coding sequences that (i) have random codon usage, (ii) codon usage determined by mutation biases, and (iii) maintain the general relationship between codon usage and gene expression via the assumption of selection-mutation-drift equilibrium. We observed correlations between dihedral bond angle and codon usage when codon usage is entirely random, indicating possible conflation of noise with differences in bond angle distributions between synonymous codons. More relevant to the general analysis of codon usage patterns, we found surprisingly good agreement between the analysis of the real sequences and the analysis of sequences simulated assuming selection-mutation-drift equilibrium, with 91% of significant synonymous codon pairs detected in the former were also detected in the latter. We believe the correlation between codon usage and dihedral bond angles resulted from the variation in codon usage across genes due to the interplay between mutation bias, natural selection for translation efficiency, and gene expression, further underscoring these factors must be controlled for when looking for novel patterns related to codon usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.