Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38618827›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of health policy and management2023

Scaling-Up eConsult: Promising Strategies to Address Enabling Factors in Four Jurisdictions in Canada.

Mylaine Breton, Catherine Lamoureux-Lamarche, Mélanie Ann Smithman, Erin Keely, Maxine Dumas Pilon, Alexander Singer, Gerard Farrell, Paula Louise Bush, Catherine Hudon, Lynn Cooper and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of health policy and management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Mylaine BretonCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5713-9618
Catherine Lamoureux-LamarcheCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.
Mélanie Ann SmithmanCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.
Erin KeelyDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Maxine Dumas PilonCollège québécois des médecins de famille, Family Medicine Center, St-Mary's Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Alexander SingerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MN, Canada.
Gerard FarrellDepartment of Family Medicine, Memorial University, St. John, NL, Canada.
Paula Louise BushDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Catherine HudonCentre de recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Lynn CooperCanadian Injured Workers Alliance, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.
Véronique NabelsiDépartement des sciences administratives, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada.
Élizabeth Côté-BoileauCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7981-962X
Justin GagnonDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Isabelle GabouryCentre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.
Carolyn Steele GrayBridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum, Research Institute, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0782-5457
Marie-Pierre GagnonFaculté des sciences infirmières, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0782-5457
Regina ViscaDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Clare LiddyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective healthcare innovations are often not scaled up beyond their initial local context. Lack of practical knowledge on how to move from local innovations to large-system improvement hinders innovation and learning capacity in health systems. Studying scale-up processes can lead to a better understanding of how to facilitate the scale-up of interventions. eConsult is a digital health innovation that aims to connect primary care professionals with specialists through an asynchronous electronic consultation. The recent implementation of eConsult in the public health systems of four Canadian jurisdictions provides a unique opportunity to identify different enabling strategies and related factors that promote the scaling up of eConsult across jurisdictions.

methodsWe conducted a narrative case study in four Canadian provinces, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, and Newfoundland & Labrador, over a 3-year period (2018-2021). We observed provincial eConsult committee meetings (n=65) and national eConsult forums (n=3), and we reviewed internal documents (n=93). We conducted semi-structured interviews with key actors in each jurisdiction (eg, researchers, primary care professionals, specialists, policy-makers, and patient partners) (n=40). We conducted thematic analysis guided by the literature on factors and strategies used to scale up innovations.

resultsWe identified a total of 31 strategies related to six key enabling factors to scaling up eConsult, including: (1) multi-actor engagement; (2) relative advantage; (3) knowledge transfer; (4) strong evidence base; (5) physician leadership; and (6) resource acquisition (eg, human, material, and financial resources). More commonly used strategies, such as leveraging research infrastructure and bringing together various actors, were used to address multiple enabling factors.

conclusionActors used various strategies to scale up eConsult within their respective contexts, and these helped address six key factors that seemed to be essential to the scale-up of eConsult.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelHealth FacilitiesDigital HealthHumansOntarioQuebecCanadaDigital HealtheConsultPolicyPrimary CareScaling-Up

Identifiers

PMID38618827
PMCPMC10590220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.