Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38618804›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2023

Women Consumers' Views on Legislation to Restrict Prominent Placement and Multibuy Promotions of High Fat, Sugar, and Salt Products in England: A Qualitative Perspective.

Preeti Dhuria, Sarah Muir, Wendy Lawrence, Emma Roe, Sarah Crozier, Cyrus Cooper, Janis Baird, Christina Vogel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Preeti DhuriaMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2803-4424
Sarah MuirMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7444-7321
Wendy LawrenceMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1264-0438
Emma RoeSchool of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4674-2133
Sarah CrozierMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9524-1127
Cyrus CooperMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3510-0709
Janis BairdMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4039-4361
Christina VogelCentre for Food Policy, City, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3897-3786

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council G0601019Medical Research Council MC_PC_21000Medical Research Council MC_PC_21001Medical Research Council MC_PC_21003Medical Research Council MC_PC_21022Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2Medical Research Council MR/J000094/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs part of the childhood obesity strategy, the UK Government has introduced regulations to restrict the ways high fat salt and sugar (HFSS) products can be promoted in retail settings from October 2022. This study explored (

methodsUsing a cross-sectional study design, qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of women who shopped at a discount supermarket. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes.

resultsParticipants' (n = 34) had a median age of 35 years and over half were in paid employment. Five themes were identified: (1) The legislation is acceptable, but people can still (and should be able to) buy HFSS items; (2) The legislation is likely to have more impact on shoppers who do not plan their shopping; (3) Affordability of healthy food is just as, or more, important than the legislation; (4) It's up to the individual to eat healthily; and (5) Government and retailers can better support consumers to make healthy choices.

conclusionMost participants were optimistic about the incoming regulations and believed that it would support consumers to make healthier food choices. Many raised concerns, however, that the high price of healthy foods and continued availability of unhealthy foods within the stores could undermine the legislation's benefits. Coupling the legislation with interventions to promote and reduce the costs of healthier products would go some way to ensure its success. Raising awareness about marketing strategies that play into consumer concerns for cost and autonomy could further increase acceptance of the policy.

Indexed as

Pediatric ObesitySugarsAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, HealthyEnglandFemaleHumansSugarsFood Shopping BehavioursHFSS RegulationsObesitySupermarket EnvironmentUK Food Policy

Identifiers

PMID38618804
PMCPMC10590244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.