Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38618564›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Behind the wheel: exploring gray matter variations in experienced drivers.

Jiangtao Chen, Xiaoyu Chen, Li Gong, Di Zhang, Qiang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiangtao Chen *Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Xiaoyu Chen *Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Li GongResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Di ZhangSchool of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5918-9691
Qiang LiuResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Driving is a complex skill involving various cognitive activities. Previous research has explored differences in the brain structures related to the navigational abilities of drivers compared to non-drivers. However, it remains unclear whether changes occur in the structures associated with low-level sensory and higher-order cognitive abilities in drivers. Methods: Gray matter volume, assessed Results: The results indicate that, in comparison to non-drivers, drivers exhibit significantly reduced gray matter volume in the middle occipital gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, and cerebellum, suggesting a relationship with driving-related experience. Furthermore, the volume of the middle occipital gyrus, and middle temporal gyrus, is found to be marginally negative related to the years of driving experience, suggesting a potential impact of driving experience on gray matter volume. However, no significant correlations were observed between driving experiences and frontal gray matter volume. Conclusion: These findings suggest that driving skills and experience have a pronounced impact on the cortical areas responsible for low-level sensory and motor processing. Meanwhile, the influence on cortical areas associated with higher-order cognitive function appears to be minimal.

Indexed as

BrainGray MatterCerebellumCognitionOccipital LobeDriving experienceDriving skillGray matter volumeSensory and motor processing

Identifiers

PMID38618564
PMCPMC11015830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.