ArticleCureus2024
Recurrent Headache With Diplopia: A Common Presentation of an Uncommon Entity.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent painful ophthalmoplegic neuropathy (RPON) is a rare headache syndrome, the diagnosis of which can be daunting to those who are not familiar with it. It presents characteristically with recurrent ocular motor weakness and ipsilateral head pain without an underlying etiology and often has unique imaging findings. Even after the successful diagnosis of this entity, there are no published management guidelines. Here, we present the case of a 31-year-old man whom we diagnosed with RPON following two episodes of unilateral headache with ophthalmoplegia over a three-month period and treated successfully with high-dose steroids on both occasions. We highlight the lack of prior migraine history and seeming antecedent viral infection as potential supporting evidence that this condition has a unique pathophysiology different from migraine. We also highlight his dramatic and reproducible response to steroids as additional evidence that steroids are good acute treatment options for this condition. Finally, as our patient lacked the expected cranial nerve imaging abnormalities on head MRI, we suggest that cranial nerve thickening and/or enhancement on MR imaging is not a sine qua non for this diagnosis, contrary to the opinion of some experts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.