ArticleCureus2024
Unveiling the Chameleon: A Case Report on Acute Intermittent Porphyria.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) is a rare autosomal dominant metabolic disorder with low penetrance, often presenting with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations. Acute neurovisceral attacks commonly occur in young women, mimicking signs and symptoms of other medical and psychiatric conditions, thus delaying the diagnosis. We present the case of an 18-year-old female college student with recurrent hospitalizations for intractable abdominal pain, now again with pain and new subjective hematuria. The patient had previously undergone an endoscopy/colonoscopy with negative biopsies and serologies for acute pathology, including celiac disease. Celiac studies were repeated, given the possibility of inadvertent gluten exposure before the onset of the latest symptoms, but were negative. Basic labs and repeat imaging, including contrast-enhanced CT, MRI, and magnetic resonance (MR) enterography of the abdomen, continued to be unremarkable, and the patient's symptoms were felt to be functional in etiology. The patient's urinalysis was normal, and pregnancy was also ruled out. The patient continued to have pain despite receiving opiate analgesics, thus prompting a psychiatry consultation. She was diagnosed with acute adjustment disorder with anxiety and was started on hydroxyzine. Due to persistent symptoms, serum and urine samples were sent, revealing low levels of porphobilinogen deaminase (PBGD) and hydroxymethylbilane synthase (HMBS) gene mutation, confirming the diagnosis of AIP. She was treated with oral glucose and outpatient IV hemin infusions with the resolution of symptoms. AIP presents a nonspecific and highly variable clinical picture, often making it a challenging diagnosis due to such a broad differential. While our patient was thought to have acute adjustment disorder due to an unremarkable initial workup, further testing revealed otherwise. This case demonstrates how clinicians must have a high suspicion of AIP when caring for young females, manifesting with neurovisceral and psychiatric signs and symptoms. Timely diagnosis improves a patient's quality of life and can decrease overutilization of healthcare resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.