ArticleCureus2024
Analyzing the Impact of Different Bonding Protocol Strategies to Improve the Fracture Resistance of Uncomplicated Crown Fractures on Tooth Fracture Reattachment in Permanent Anterior Teeth: An In-vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of iRoot BP Plus for Pulpotomy in Permanent Anterior Teeth With Complicated Crown Fractures in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aims to analyze three different bonding protocol strategies in determining the fracture resistance on the reattachment of fragments in permanent anterior teeth. Methodology This study evaluated the ability of three bonding methods (Group A, total-etch technique; Group B, selective-etch technique; and Group C, self-etch technique) to enhance the fracture resistance of reattached tooth fragments. Sixty permanent maxillary central incisors were chosen, segmented at 3 mm from the incisal edge, and randomly distributed among the three groups. Tooth fragments were stored for 24 hours in GC Tooth Mousse (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and then reattachment was done using respective bonding techniques. Fracture resistance was gauged using a universal testing machine. Results The mean fracture resistance values were as follows: total-etch (419.5995 N), selective-etch (359.1448 N), and self-etch (192.0887 N). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey tests revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups. It was inferred that the total-etch technique exhibited the highest fracture resistance, while the self-etch technique resulted in the lowest fracture resistance (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.