ArticleCureus2024
Diagnosis of Mucormycosis Using Frozen Section, Histopathology, Culture, and Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Techniques: A Comparative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Intra-abdominal Mucormycosis in an Immunocompetent Host: A Rare Presentation and Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mucormycosis usually occurs in immunocompromised patients or those with uncontrolled diabetes. Along the third wave of SARS-CoV-2, an associated angioinvasive opportunistic infection with Mucor, a life-threatening fungal infection, was rampant and emerging. With an increase in the usage of steroids in the COVID scenario, the rate of mucormycosis did take a rapid and alarming increase in King Edward Memorial Hospital, Pune, India. Any delay in the diagnosis and management of the disease was life-threatening. The most conventional methods to diagnose mucormycosis are microbiological culture and histopathology of the tissue. The microbiological culture method plays an important role in the diagnosis of mucormycosis. However, the technique is labour-intensive, taking seven to eight days. Histopathology leads to false-negative reports if the tissue is not biopsied from representative sites. On the other hand, molecular methods are rapid, reliable, and applicable to different body samples, such as tissue, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, plasma, and urine. We aimed to use a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method to detect Mucor in plasma samples. Due to a lack of availability of fresh samples, nucleic acid was extracted from the tissue sections of 69 cases diagnosed as Mucor by histopathology. These samples were subjected to RT-PCR using the MucorGenius kit (Pathonostics, Maastricht, Netherlands). A total of 57 tissue samples were sent for culture, and 49% of our cases were positive by culture and equally by RT-PCR. There was 80% sensitivity and 76% specificity between culture and PCR techniques. However, the use of blood/plasma for RT-PCR for early diagnosis of mucormycosis will be the method of choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.