ArticleOTO open
Epistaxis Rates and Health Care Utilization in Patients With a Ventricular Assist Device.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Identify baseline epistaxis rates and epistaxis-related health care utilization trends in the ventricular assist device (VAD) population. Methods: Single center, retrospective cohort study consisting of chart review of adult VAD patients. Analysis of descriptive statistics was assessed using Results: Two hundred ninety patients were included in the analysis. Ninety-eight (33.8%) patients developed epistaxis and 84 (29.0%) received medical attention. Patients with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding had increased rates of epistaxis (42.4% vs 29.0%). Logistic regression analysis found GI bleeding to have an adjusted odds of developing epistaxis of 1.94 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-3.37) and kidney disease to have an adjusted odds of 1.83 (95% CI: 1.06, 3.13). Discussion: VAD implantation improves survival and quality of life but also carries significant bleeding risks. At our institution, 29% of VAD patients received medical attention for epistaxis. GI bleeding and kidney disease were found to have increased adjusted odds of developing epistaxis. Fifty-nine percent of epistaxis events occurred while inpatient and 32.8% of events were seen in the emergency department. Implications for Practice: VAD patients are an at-risk group that could potentially benefit from preventative nasal hydration regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.