ArticleReports of biochemistry & molecular biology2023
Resistance Improvement and Sensitivity Enhancement of Cancer Therapy by a Novel Antitumor Candidate onto A2780 CP and A2780 S Cell Lines.
Article in Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural Products in Cancer Research: Mechanistic Advances, Translational Challenges, and the Emerging Role of Chilean Biodiversity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Synthesis and Anticancer Activity of Polymer Nanocomposites with Moringa- Extracted CuO and AgReports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To overcome cisplatin resistance, the cytotoxicity of a novel antitumor agent on two ovarian cancer cell lines sensitive and resistant to cisplatin was investigated. Methods: MTT assay and flow cytometry were performed to assess the cytotoxicity of a novel water-soluble Pd (II) complex, [Pd(bpy)(pyr-dtc)]NO Results: The IC50 values of PBPD in resistant cells were higher than those in sensitive cells. Furthermore, PBPD has a deadlier effect on sensitive cells compared to resistant cells, and the cell survival rate is reduced over time. Flow cytometry revealed that PBPD enhanced the population of living-resistant cells while driving them to apoptosis. PBPD, on the other hand, has a greater effect on the living cell population and has dramatically shifted the population toward apoptosis and necrosis in the sensitive cells. Furthermore, gene expression analysis showed that when sensitive and resistant cells were treated with cisplatin, all resistance genes increased significantly relative to the control. In contrast to OCT4, MDR1, STAT3, and CD99 resistance genes were not significantly elevated in sensitive cells treated with PBPD compared to the control. Thus, the expression of resistance genes in resistant cells treated with PBPD was lower than cisplatin. Conclusions: As a result, PBPD is a promising anticancer agent for CDDP-resistant ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.