Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38618232›Full record

ArticleInterface focus2024

Diverse material properties and morphology of moth proboscises relates to the feeding habits of some macromoth and other lepidopteran lineages.

Elaine M Bast, Natalie T Marshall, Kendall O Myers, Lucas W Marsh, Martin Walschburger Hurtado, Peter A Van Zandt, Matthew S Lehnert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interface focus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elaine M BastDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University at Stark, North Canton, OH, USA.
Natalie T MarshallDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University at Stark, North Canton, OH, USA.
Kendall O MyersDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University at Stark, North Canton, OH, USA.
Lucas W MarshDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University at Stark, North Canton, OH, USA.
Martin Walschburger HurtadoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University at Stark, North Canton, OH, USA.
Peter A Van ZandtDepartment of Biology, Birmingham-Southern College, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Matthew S LehnertDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University at Stark, North Canton, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1999-196X
Kent State University at Stark · USBirmingham–Southern College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects have evolved unique structures that host a diversity of material and mechanical properties, and the mouthparts (proboscis) of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) are no exception. Here, we examined proboscis morphology and material properties from several previously unstudied moth lineages to determine if they relate to flower visiting and non-flower visiting feeding habits. Scanning electron microscopy and three-dimensional imaging were used to study proboscis morphology and assess surface roughness patterns on the galeal surface, respectively. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to study patterns of cuticular autofluorescence, which was quantified with colour analysis software. We found that moth proboscises display similar autofluorescent signals and morphological patterns in relation to feeding habits to those previously described for flower and non-flower visiting butterflies. The distal region of proboscises of non-flower visitors is brush-like for augmented capillarity and exhibited blue autofluorescence, indicating the possible presence of resilin and increased flexibility. Flower visitors have smoother proboscises and show red autofluorescence, an indicator of high sclerotization, which is adaptive for floral tube entry. We propose the lepidopteran proboscis as a model structure for understanding how insects have evolved a suite of morphological and material adaptations to overcome the challenges of acquiring fluids from diverse sources.

Indexed as

feeding habitsLepidopteramorphologymouthpartsproboscistaxonomic bias

Identifiers

PMID38618232
PMCPMC11008959
OpenAlexW4394709771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.