ArticleSpine surgery and related research2024
Pediatric Cervical Kyphosis: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis and Literature Review.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical management of congenital C2 over C3 spondyloptosis with severe cervical kyphosis: two case reports.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to investigate cervical kyphosis in children, which has gained increasing attention in recent years due to its higher incidence and its association with tumor surgeries, and to shed light on the unique anatomical and biomechanical differences between pediatric and adult populations regarding cervical sagittal alignment. Additionally, it explores the diverse causes and management approaches, which often pose significant challenges. Furthermore, this study presents the management outcomes from three spine centers in the Middle East. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patient records from 2009 to 2021 in three centers located in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan. Demographic and clinical data were collected, imaging studies were reviewed, and various treatment modalities and their corresponding outcomes were documented and analyzed. Additionally, a literature review on pediatric cervical kyphosis and its management was performed. Results: Seventeen patients were included in this study. The average age at presentation was 11.9 years. Among the participants, 14 underwent surgical treatment, 1 was treated with Minerva orthosis, and 2 were observed. The mean follow-up period was 32.4 months. In surgically treated patients, a statistically significant higher degree of correction was achieved when combining anterior and posterior surgeries compared to performing standalone anterior or posterior surgery (P-value = 0.014). Conclusions: Although rare, pediatric cervical kyphosis is a significant condition within the spectrum of pediatric deformities and frequently occurs as a component of syndromes or as a result of iatrogenic factors. Neck pain and myelopathy are the most commonly observed symptoms. Thorough evaluation and complex surgical interventions are typically required for most cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.