Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38618206›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

An artificial intelligence model for detecting pathological lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer using whole slide images: a retrospective, multicentre, diagnostic study.

Shaoxu Wu, Yun Wang, Guibin Hong, Yun Luo, Zhen Lin, Runnan Shen, Hong Zeng, Abai Xu, Peng Wu, Mingzhao Xiao and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Mechanisms and Immune Regulation in Prostate Cancer: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial intelligence in prostate cancer.Chinese medical journal · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Shaoxu WuDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yun WangDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Guibin HongDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yun LuoDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhen LinCellsVision Medical Technology Services Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
Runnan ShenDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hong ZengDepartment of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Abai XuDepartment of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Peng WuDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Mingzhao XiaoDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaoyang LiDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Peng RaoDepartment of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qishen YangDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhengyuan FengDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Quanhao HeDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Fan JiangDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ye XieDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Chengxiao LiaoDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaowei HuangCellsVision Medical Technology Services Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
Rui ChenCellsVision Medical Technology Services Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
Tianxin LinDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The pathological examination of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is crucial for treating prostate cancer (PCa). However, the limitations with naked-eye detection and pathologist workload contribute to a high missed-diagnosis rate for nodal micrometastasis. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based, time-efficient, and high-precision PCa LNM detector (ProCaLNMD) and evaluate its clinical application value. Methods: In this multicentre, retrospective, diagnostic study, consecutive patients with PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection at five centres between Sep 2, 2013 and Apr 28, 2023 were included, and histopathological slides of resected lymph nodes were collected and digitised as whole-slide images for model development and validation. ProCaLNMD was trained at a dataset from a single centre (the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University [SYSMH]), and externally validated in the other four centres. A bladder cancer dataset from SYSMH was used to further validate ProCaLNMD, and an additional validation (human-AI comparison and collaboration study) containing consecutive patients with PCa from SYSMH was implemented to evaluate the application value of integrating ProCaLNMD into the clinical workflow. The primary endpoint was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of ProCaLNMD. In addition, the performance measures for pathologists with ProCaLNMD assistance was also assessed. Findings: In total, 8225 slides from 1297 patients with PCa were collected and digitised. Overall, 8158 slides (18,761 lymph nodes) from 1297 patients with PCa (median age 68 years [interquartile range 64-73]; 331 [26%] with LNM) were used to train and validate ProCaLNMD. The AUROC of ProCaLNMD ranged from 0.975 (95% confidence interval 0.953-0.998) to 0.992 (0.982-1.000) in the training and validation datasets, with sensitivities > 0.955 and specificities > 0.921. ProCaLNMD also demonstrated an AUROC of 0.979 in the cross-cancer dataset. ProCaLNMD use triggered true reclassification in 43 (4.3%) slides in which micrometastatic tumour regions were initially missed by pathologists, thereby correcting 28 (8.5%) missed-diagnosed cases of previous routine pathological reports. In the human-AI comparison and collaboration study, the sensitivity of ProCaLNMD (0.983 [0.908-1.000]) surpassed that of two junior pathologists (0.862 [0.746-0.939], Interpretation: ProCaLNMD demonstrated high diagnostic capabilities for identifying LNM in prostate cancer, reducing the likelihood of missed diagnoses by pathologists and decreasing the slide reviewing time, highlighting its potential for clinical application. Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, the National Key Research and Development Programme of China, the Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Urological Diseases, and the Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDigital pathologyLymph node metastasisMulticentre validationProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID38618206
PMCPMC11015342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.