SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024
Probiotics are beneficial for liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Covert hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis: implications for early diagnosis and appropriate management.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Review
- Harnessing the power of the gut microbiome: a review of supplementation diagnosis and therapy for liver cirrhosis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Gut Dysbiosis, Malnutrition and Sarcopenia in Liver Cirrhosis: A Narrative Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Special Issue "Studies on Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Products in Health and Diseases: 2nd Edition".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Probiotic Strains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota and postoperative delirium: mechanistic integration of the "gut-liver-anesthesia axis" in the context of liver disease and perioperative intervention strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Saccharomyces cervisiae ameliorative impact combined with sulfaclozine on broiler chicken oxidative status.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Recent advances in therapeutic probiotics: insights from human trials.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Gut feeling gone wrong: Tangled relationship between disorders of gut-brain interaction and liver disease.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Gut microbiota, liver disease, and perioperative anesthesia: interactions, risks, and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Progress in Probiotic Science: Prospects of Functional Probiotic-Based Foods and Beverages.International journal of food science · 2025Review
- Gut Microbiota as Emerging Players in the Development of Alcohol-Related Liver Disease.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- The Role of Dietary Ingredients and Herbs in the Prevention of Non-Communicable Chronic Liver Disease.Nutrients · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gut dysbiosis may play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of cirrhosis and the severity of complications. Numerous studies have investigated the probiotics as treatments for cirrhosis. However, there is still a lack of definitive evidence confirming the beneficial effects of probiotics on cirrhosis. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of probiotic intervention and control treatments, including placebo, no treatment, and active control, on cirrhosis, published from inception to February 2024. Outcomes included hepatic encephalopathy (HE) reversal, safety and tolerability of probiotics, liver function, quality of life, and other cirrhotic-related outcomes. A meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize evidence. Results: Thirty studies were included. The quantitative synthesis results showed that compared with the control group, probiotics significantly reverse minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) (risk ratio [RR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 2.32) and improve HE (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.06). Additionally, probiotics demonstrated higher safety and tolerability by causing a lower incidence of serious adverse events (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.87). Probiotics could potentially improve liver function by reducing the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.57, 95% CI -0.85 to -0.30), and displayed favorable changes in quality of life (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.75) and gut flora (SMD 1.67, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.06). Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis offers compelling evidence that probiotics are beneficial for cirrhosis by demonstrating reversal of HE, potential for liver function improvements, enhancements in quality of life, and regulation of gut dysbiosis. Furthermore, the apparent safety profile suggests that probiotics are a promising intervention for treating cirrhosis. Clinical trial registration number: CRD42023478380.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.