Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38618172›Full record

ReviewCampbell systematic reviews2024

Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence and related forms of violence: A systematic review.

James Lewis, Sarah Marsden, Adrian Cherney, Martine Zeuthen, Lotta Rahlf, Chloe Squires, Anne Peterscheck

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Campbell systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

James LewisHanda Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence (CSTPV), School of International Relations University of St Andrews St Andrews, Fife Scotland UK.
Sarah MarsdenHanda Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence (CSTPV), School of International Relations University of St Andrews St Andrews, Fife Scotland UK.
Adrian CherneySchool of Social Science University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Martine ZeuthenRoyal United Services Institute (RUSI) Mombasa Kenya.
Lotta RahlfPeace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF) Frankfurt Germany.
Chloe SquiresHanda Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence (CSTPV), School of International Relations University of St Andrews St Andrews, Fife Scotland UK.
Anne PeterscheckHanda Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence (CSTPV), School of International Relations University of St Andrews St Andrews, Fife Scotland UK.
University of St Andrews · GBPeace Research Institute Frankfurt · DEThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Increasingly, counter-radicalisation interventions are using case management approaches to structure the delivery of tailored services to those at risk of engaging in, or engaged in, violent extremism. This review sets out the evidence on case management tools and approaches and is made up of two parts with the following objectives. Objectives: Search Methods: Search terms tailored for Part I and Part II were used to search research repositories, grey literature sources and academic journals for studies published between 2000 and 2022. Searches were conducted in August and September 2022. Forward and backward citation searches and consultations with experts took place between September 2022 and February 2023. Studies in English, French, German, Russian, Swedish, Norwegian and Danish were eligible. Selection Criteria: Data Collection and Analysis: Findings: Authors' Conclusions: The effectiveness of existing case management tools and approaches is poorly understood, and research examining the factors that influence how different approaches are implemented is limited. However, there is a growing body of research on the factors which facilitate or generate barriers to the implementation of case management interventions. Many of the factors and moderators relevant to countering radicalisation to violence also impact how case management tools and approaches used to counter other forms of violence are implemented. Research in this wider field seems to have transferable insights for efforts to counter radicalisation to violence. This review provides a platform for further research to test the impact of different tools, and the mechanisms by which they inform outcomes. This work will benefit from using the case management framework as a way of rationalising and analysing the range of tools, approaches and processes that make up case managed interventions to counter radicalisation to violence.

Identifiers

PMID38618172
PMCPMC11015087
OpenAlexW4394785955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.