ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024
Performance of posterior third-generation monolithic zirconia crowns in a complete digital workflow: A three-year prospective clinical study.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcome of translucent zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior crowns in a digital workflow: A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025Trial
- Performance of posterior 3D printed resin-matrix ceramic crowns fabricated in a fully digital workflow: a two-year prospective clinical study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Fatigue Performance and Failure Loads of Composition-Gradient Multilayer Zirconia: Partial-Coverage Restorations Versus Single Crowns at Different Thicknesses.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of Speed Sintering and Glazing Effects on the Flexural Strength and Microstructure of Highly Translucent Multilayered 5 mol% Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The effect of thermocycling on fracture resistance of zirconia crowns cemented with polylysine modified resin cements (Comparative in vitro study).Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Translucent monolithic zirconia restorations have recently introduced. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical behavior and the survival rate of the posterior third-generation monolithic zirconia crowns (MZCs) during three years of clinical service. Materials and methods: Twenty-four patients who needed thirty crowns were enrolled in this study. Digital impressions were made, and the crowns were milled and cemented with a resin cement. The crowns outcomes were assessed using the California Dental Association's (CDA) criteria. Gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), and periodontal probing depth (PPD) for MZCs and contralateral natural teeth (control) were assessed. Margin index (MI) for MZCs was also assessed. Data analysis was conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank and the Friedman tests. Results: The 3-year survival rate was 100%. All MZCs were rated as satisfactory throughout the follow-up period, and no biological or mechanical complications were observed. No differences were recorded when GI, PI and PPD at 3-year of follow-up were compared to baseline. No differences were recorded between crowned and control teeth. The MI remained stable throughout the study period. Conclusion: The third-generation monolithic zirconia appears to be a good treatment option for the rehabilitation of posterior single teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.