Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617979›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of psychiatry2024

Navigating the intersection of psychiatry and ophthalmology: A comprehensive review of depression and anxiety management in glaucoma patients.

Prasanna Venkatesh Ramesh, Arvind Kumar Morya, Ashik Azad, Pavithra Pannerselvam, Aji Kunnath Devadas, Sai Thaejesvi Gopalakrishnan, Shruthy Vaishali Ramesh, Ajanya K Aradhya

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Prasanna Venkatesh RameshDepartment of Glaucoma and Research, Mahathma Eye Hospital Private Limited, Trichy 620017, Tamil Nadu, India. email2prajann@gmail.com.
Arvind Kumar MoryaDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad 508126, Telangana, India.
Ashik AzadDepartment of Optometry and Visual Science, Mahathma Eye Hospital Private Limited, Trichy 620017, Tamil Nadu, India.
Pavithra PannerselvamJunior Resident, Mahathma Eye Hospital Private Limited, Trichy 620017, Tamil Nadu, India.
Aji Kunnath DevadasDepartment of Optometry and Visual Science, Mahathma Eye Hospital Private Limited, Trichy 620017, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sai Thaejesvi GopalakrishnanJunior Resident, Mahathma Eye Hospital Private Limited, Trichy 620017, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shruthy Vaishali RameshDepartment of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Mahathma Eye Hospital Private Limited, Trichy 620017, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ajanya K AradhyaDepartment of Optometry and Visual Science, Mahathma Eye Hospital Private Limited, Trichy 620017, Tamil Nadu, India.
Joseph Eye Hospital · INVasan Eye Care Hospital · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INRaghudeep Eye Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma, a prevalent and debilitating eye disease, has long been associated with vision impairment and blindness. However, recent research has shed light on the often-underestimated psychological dimensions of this condition. Anxiety and depression, two pervasive psychiatric comorbidities, have been increasingly recognized among glaucoma patients. This comprehensive review aims to explore the intricate relationship between psychiatry and ophthalmology, in the context of managing depression and anxiety in glaucoma patients. By meticulously examining peer-reviewed literature, we synthesize current knowledge on the prevalence, risk factors, and underlying mechanisms of anxiety and depression in glaucoma. The evidence reveals that glaucoma patients face an elevated risk of experiencing these mood disorders. Factors such as progressive vision loss, complex medication regimens, and the fear of further visual deterioration contribute to their vulnerability. Moreover, we delve into the bidirectional relationship between glaucoma and mood disorders, shedding light on the complex interplay between ocular and emotional health. Our review investigates the implications of anxiety and depression on glaucoma management, including their potential impact on treatment adherence, disease progression, and overall quality of life. We also explore the neurobiological pathways linking glaucoma and mood disorders, providing a foundation for future research and potential therapeutic interventions. In conclusion, recognizing the psychological burden carried by glaucoma patients is essential for holistic and patient-centered care. This review underscores the pressing need for integrated approaches that bring together ophthalmological and psychiatric expertise to optimize the well-being of individuals facing the challenges of glaucoma. By addressing anxiety and depression in glaucoma care, healthcare providers can enhance the overall quality of life for these patients, ultimately leading to improved outcomes and a brighter future for those affected by this condition. This review offers valuable insight for healthcare practitioners and researchers, providing a concise overview of key topics and research in the field of managing depression and anxiety in glaucoma patients.

Indexed as

AnxietyBidirectional relationshipDepressionGlaucomaPsychiatryRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38617979
PMCPMC11008383
OpenAlexW4392964690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.